When the President gave it to me, I was so touched. I’d heard of the prize - it’s the biggest for popular music in the US. Some people don’t believe in climate warming - like those who don’t believe there was a Holocaust.” “Sadly we need disasters like this to show people. I have to be honest and say that one thing that really gave me the creeps was McCartney “buddying up” to Obama and taking a swipe at those who question the AGW Agenda – and those who question other “official truths”. “Getting By With a Little Help From My Friends” If you’re short on time, the key remarks are in part 2 at about 3 min 14s in. I found Heather Mills remarks on GMTV on to be very interesting – and whatever their meaning, she does an excellent job of illustrating the role of the media in “dealing with” any “nails that stick up” which need “bashing down”. But other deaths are not that well known about – such as the death of Mal Evans, a “roadie” for the Beatles. We also have a number of untimely deaths – Brian Epstein and of course John Lennon and George Harrison. But do they have a deeper, more sinister meaning? On their own, they prove nothing, but knowing “operating procedures” of the Secret Apparatus which runs all major affairs on Planet Earth, we can see that this may be one of those scenarios in which they “give us clues” as to what they are doing behind the scenes. Paul has himself made strange remarks about “another him”, which could easily be interpreted innocently – referring, perhaps, to how much one’s life changes over time. “Do You Want to Know A Secret… Do You Promise Not to Tell…”Īdded to the facial evidence, we have a catalogue of strange remarks made by John Lennon, Heather Mills and others close to McCartney. We discuss some of these troubling issues in the interview. It is hard to believe and hard to accept that they other band members, friends and so on would either not have known this or would have known and “gone along” with what transpired. However, I wonder if it happened at the end or after their tour of America. Tina contends that Paul was switched with Faul between about the 26th and 28th of August 1966. ĭownload – Tina Foster – Faul – PID – Discussion of the Evidence – You can listen and download using the links below. As I was troubled by this issue, I asked Tina if she would record a Podcast with me, which she kindly agreed to do on 21st Jan 2012. You can find the blog at plasticmacca.blogspo…. Thanks to a link sent by a friend, I found out about a comprehensive blog detailing a number of areas of evidence which seem to show there is more to this than backmasking, reverse speech and rumour. But instead, the nose changes in length and width, the chin changes dramatically from an almost perfectly symmetrical one with a cleft straight down the middleĪnd then, there are discrepancies with changes in height (about 2 inches), ear anomalies and even eye colour! Analysis of voice prints (admissible in court) also appears to reveal differences between Paul pre-1966 and post 1966.īut what does the evidence show? Is the above just “cherry picking”? What are the things that are “glossed over”? You won’t know until you’ve looked, will you? Interview with Tina Foster re “Faul and Paul” Watch the ears, nose and chin closely – the distance between the eyes has been equalized, and you have already seen that this comparison should be an almost perfectly clean crossfade. (With the Beatles-1963+Yesterday and Today-66) Nevertheless, the physical evidence is quite compelling – as shown in this detailed analysis here …. I have reproduced a small portion of this below. Who can blame him – watching things like “Anthology” or any of the numerous Beatles-related documentaries and interviews makes is hard to believe that “Faul” could have the memories that were really Paul’s. A close member of my family who, like me, is a fan of the Beatles found it very difficult (impossible even) to entertain the notion that McCartney could have been replaced. This is, again, one of those stories which people can snort with laughter at, as it just seems unbelievable for so many reasons. Some years ago, I came across some evidence that Paul McCartney had been “replaced” by a “double” – some time in 1966. Andrew Johnson ( Jan 2012 (Revised in days following to add details and correct typos etc)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |